Wardselitelimo is devoted to any sort of latest news in different spheres of life but the main sphere that attracts the attention of a lot of people is financial and which is related to any sort of loans and credits. Another crucial thing for our readers is associated with finance payday loans that can be borrowed within the shortest time possible and you will be able to learn all the latest offers from direct lenders available in the financial market right now.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Complete-Linkage Clustering

Next, lets examine whether using the complete-linkage criterion would result in a different clustering of this sample data set. Complete linkage seeks to minimize the distance among the records in two clusters that are farthest from each other. Figure 8.3 illustrates complete-linkage clustering for this data set.

* Step 1: Since each cluster contains a single record only, there is no difference between single linkage and complete linkage at step 1. The two clusters each containing 33 are again combined.
* Step 2: Just as for single linkage, the clusters containing values 15 and 16 are combined into a new cluster. Again, this is because there is no difference in the two criteria for single-record clusters.
* Step 3: At this point, complete linkage begins to diverge from its predecessor. In single linkage, cluster {15,16} was at this point combined with cluster {18}. But complete linkage looks at the farthest neighbors, not the nearest neighbors. The farthest neighbors for these two clusters are 15 and 18, for a distance of 3. This is the same distance separating clusters {2} and {5}. The completelinkage criterion is silent regarding ties, so we arbitrarily select the first such combination found, therefore combining the clusters {2} and {5} into a new cluster.
* Step 4: Now cluster {15,16} is combined with cluster {18}.
* Step 5: Cluster {2,5} is combined with cluster {9}, since the complete-linkage distance is 7, the smallest among remaining clusters.
* Step 6: Cluster {25} is combined with cluster {33,33}, with a complete-linkage distance of 8.
* Step 7: Cluster {2,5,9} is combined with cluster {15,16,18}, with a completelinkage distance of 16.
* Step 8: Cluster {25,33,33} is combined with cluster {45}, with a completelinkage distance of 20.
* Step 9: Cluster {2,5,9,15,16,18} is combined with cluster {25,33,33,45}. All records are now contained in this last large cluster.

Finally, with average linkage, the criterion is the average distance of all the records in cluster A from all the records in cluster B. Since the average of a single record is the records value itself, this method does not differ from the earlier methods in the early stages, where single-record clusters are being combined. At step 3, average linkage would be faced with the choice of combining clusters {2} and {5}, or combining the {15, 16} cluster with the single-record {18} cluster. The average distance between the {15, 16} cluster and the {18} cluster is the average of |18 ? 15| and |18?16|, which is 2.5, while the average distance between clusters {2} and {5} is of course 3. Therefore, average linkage would combine the {15, 16} cluster with cluster
{18} at this step, followed by combining cluster {2} with cluster {5}. The reader may verify that the average-linkage criterion leads to the same hierarchical structure for this example as the complete-linkage criterion. In general, average linkage leads to clusters more similar in shape to complete linkage than does single linkage.

No comments:

Post a Comment